The Federalist Society and Constitutional Interpretation: Who Gets to Say What the Constitution Says
Date of Award
Spring 5-2021
Degree Type
Dissertation-Restricted
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Program
Political Science
Department
Political Science
Major Professor
Dr. Salmon Shomade
Second Advisor
Dr. Christine Day
Third Advisor
Dr. Edward Chervenak
Abstract
The Federalist Society was organized in 1982 by conservative law students to counteract what they perceived to be a liberal bias in law schools, the courts, and government administration. Forty years later there is an acknowledgement of a rightward turn in the Supreme Court which scholars have attributed in part to the efforts of the Federalist Society. However, there is still little understanding of just how that change came about. This dissertation takes a step toward understanding that question. Viewing the Federalist Society as the center of a network of lawyers, think tanks, and legal institutions, I examine the influence the Federalist Society Network has on voting rights and public sector unionization. I analyzed these cases - South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193, and Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013) to assess the Federalist Society Network’s influence on voting rights. I also examined these additional cases - Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), Knox v. Service Employees International Union, 567 U.S. 298, (2012), Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616,(2014), and Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 585 U.S. (2018) to assess the impact the Federalist Society Network has on public sector union agency fees. I use content analysis to compare the themes asserted in petitioners’ and amicus curiae briefs with the themes expressed in the majority opinions in these cases. I find that the Federalist Society Network has influenced the majority opinions in these cases.
Recommended Citation
Toscano, Deborah L., "The Federalist Society and Constitutional Interpretation: Who Gets to Say What the Constitution Says" (2021). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2903.
https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2903
Included in
American Politics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons
Rights
The University of New Orleans and its agents retain the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible this dissertation or thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation.